Superluminous supernova

From the Science Archives, the open-project database of science information that barely anyone can edit
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Multiple issues

NASA artist's impression of the explosion of SN 2006gy, a superluminous supernova

A super-luminous supernova (SLSN, plural super luminous supernovae or SLSNe), also known as a hypernova, is a type of stellar explosion with a luminosity 10 or more times higher than that of standard supernovae.[1] Like supernovae, SLSNe seem to be produced by several mechanisms, which is readily revealed by their light-curves and spectra. There are multiple models for what conditions may produce an SLSN, including core collapse in particularly massive stars, millisecond magnetars, interaction with circumstellar material (CSM model), or pair-instability supernovae.

Hypernovae produce long gamma ray bursts (GRBs), which range from 2 seconds to over a minute in duration.

GRBs were initially detected on July 2, 1967 by US military satellites in high orbit, which were meant to detect gamma radiation. The US had suspected the USSR of conducting secret nuclear tests despite signing the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963, and the Vela satellites were capable of detecting explosions behind the moon. The satellites detected a signal, but it was unlike that of a nuclear weapon signature, nor could it be correlated to solar flares.[2]

Over the next few decades, the GRBs posed a compelling mystery. Gamma rays require highly energetic events to be produced, yet GRBs could not be correlated to supernovae, solar flares, or any other activity in the sky. Their brevity made them difficult to trace. Once their direction could be determined, it was found that they were evenly spread across the sky. Thus they were not originating in the Milky Way or nearby galaxies, but from deep space.

In February 1997, Dutch-Italian satellite BeppoSAX was able to trace GRB 970508 to a faint galaxy roughly 6 billion light years away.[3] From analyzing the spectroscopic data for both the burst and the galaxy, Bloom et al. concluded that a hypernova was the likely cause. That same year, hypernovae were hypothesized in greater detail by Polish astronomer Bohdan Paczyński.[4]

The first hypernova observed was SN 1998bw, with a luminosity 100 times higher than a standard Type Ib.[5]

The first confirmed superluminous supernova connected to a gamma ray burst was not found until 2003, when GRB 030329 illuminated the Leo constellation.[6] SN 2003dh represented the death of a star 25 times more massive than the sun, with material being blasted out at over a tenth the speed of light.[7]

In June 2018, AT2018cow was detected and found to be a very powerful astronomical explosion, 10 – 100 times brighter than a normal supernova.[8][9]

Today, it is believed that stars with M ≥ 40 M produce superluminous supernovae.[10]


Discoveries of many SLSNe in the 21st century showed that not only were they more luminous by an order of magnitude than most supernovae, they were also unlikely to be powered by the typical radioactive decay that is responsible for the observed energies of conventional supernovae.Template:Verification needed

SLSNe events use a separate classification scheme to distinguish them from the conventional type Ia, type Ib/Ic, and type II supernovae,[11] roughly distinguishing between the spectral signature of hydrogen-rich and hydrogen-poor events.Template:Verification needed

Hydrogen-rich SLSNe are classified as Type SLSN-II, with observed radiation passing through the changing opacity of a thick expanding hydrogen envelope. Most hydrogen-poor events are classified as Type SLSN-I, with its visible radiation produced from a large expanding envelope of material powered by an unknown mechanism. A third less common group of SLSNe is also hydrogen-poor and abnormally luminous, but clearly powered by radioactivity from 56Ni.[12]Template:Verification needed

Increasing number of discoveries find that some SLSNe do not fit cleanly into these three classes, so further sub-classes or unique events have been described. Many or all SLSN-I show spectra without hydrogen or helium but have lightcurves comparable to conventional type Ic supernovae, and are now classed as SLSN-Ic.[13] PS1-10afx is an unusually red hydrogen-free SLSN with an extremely rapid rise to a near-record peak luminosity and an unusually rapid decline.[14] PS1-11ap is similar to a type Ic SLSN but has an unusually slow rise and decline.[13]

Astrophysical models

A wide variety of causes have been proposed to explain events that are an order of magnitude or more greater than standard supernovae. The collapsar and CSM (circumstellar material) models are generally accepted and a number of events are well-observed. Other models are still only tentatively accepted or remain entirely theoretical.

Collapsar model

Light curves compared to normal supernovae.

The collapsar model is a type of superluminous supernova that produces a gravitationally collapsed object, or black hole. The word "collapsar", short for "collapsed star", was formerly used to refer to the end product of stellar gravitational collapse, a stellar-mass black hole. The word is now sometimes used to refer to a specific model for the collapse of a fast-rotating star. When core collapse occurs in a star with a core at least around fifteen times the sun's mass (M)—though chemical composition and rotational rate are also significant—the explosion energy is insufficient to expel the outer layers of the star, and it will collapse into a black hole without producing a visible supernova outburst.

A star with a core mass slightly below this level—in the range of 5–15 M—will undergo a supernova explosion, but so much of the ejected mass falls back onto the core remnant that it still collapses into a black hole. If such a star is rotating slowly, then it will produce a faint supernova, but if the star is rotating quickly enough, then the fallback to the black hole will produce relativistic jets. The energy that these jets transfer into the ejected shell renders the visible outburst substantially more luminous than a standard supernova. The jets also beam high energy particles and gamma rays directly outward and thereby produce x-ray or gamma-ray bursts; the jets can last for several seconds or longer and correspond to long-duration gamma-ray bursts, but they do not appear to explain short-duration gamma-ray bursts.

Stars with 5–15 M cores have an approximate total mass of 25–90 M, assuming the star has not undergone significant mass loss. Such a star will still have a hydrogen envelope and will explode as a Type II supernova. Faint Type II supernovae have been observed, but no definite candidates for a Type II SLSN (except type IIn, which are not thought to be jet supernovae). Only the very lowest metallicity population III stars will reach this stage of their life with little mass loss. Other stars, including most of those visible to us, will have had most of their outer layers blown away by their high luminosity and become Wolf-Rayet stars. Some theories propose these will produce either Type Ib or Type Ic supernovae, but none of these events so far has been observed in nature. Many observed SLSNe are likely Type Ic. Those associated with gamma-ray bursts are almost always Type Ic, being very good candidates for having relativistic jets produced by fallback to a black hole. However, not all Type Ic SLSNe correspond to observed gamma-ray bursts but the events would only be visible if one of the jets were aimed towards us.

In recent years, much observational data on long-duration gamma-ray bursts have significantly increased our understanding of these events and made clear that the collapsar model produces explosions that differ only in detail from more or less ordinary supernovae and have energy ranges from approximately normal to around 100 times larger.

A good example of a collapsar SLSN is SN 1998bw,[15] which was associated with the gamma-ray burst GRB 980425. It is classified as a type Ic supernova due to its distinctive spectral properties in the radio spectrum, indicating the presence of relativistic matter.

Circumstellar material model

Almost all observed SLSNe have had spectra similar to either a type Ic or type IIn supernova. The type Ic SLSNe are thought to be produced by jets from fallback to a black hole, but type IIn SLSNe have significantly different light curves and are not associated with gamma-ray bursts. Type IIn supernovae are all embedded in a dense nebula probably expelled from the progenitor star itself, and this circumstellar material (CSM) is thought to be the cause of the extra luminosity.[16] When material expelled in an initial normal supernova explosion meets dense nebular material or dust close to the star, the shockwave converts kinetic energy efficiently into visible radiation. This effect greatly enhances these extended duration and extremely luminous supernovae, even though the initial explosive energy was the same as that of normal supernovae.

Although any supernova type could potentially produce Type IIn SLSNe, theoretical constraints on the surrounding CSM sizes and densities do suggest that it will almost always be produced from the central progenitor star itself immediately prior to the observed supernova event. Such stars are likely candidates of hypergiants or LBVs that appear to be undergoing substantial mass loss, due to Eddington instability, for example, SN2005gl.[17]

Pair-instability supernova

Another type of suspected SLSN is a pair-instability supernova, of which SN 2006gy[18] may possibly be the first observed example. This supernova event was observed in a galaxy about 238 million light years (73 megaparsecs) from Earth.

The theoretical basis for pair-instability collapse has been known for many decades[19] and was suggested as a dominant source of higher mass elements in the early universe as super-massive population III stars exploded. In a pair-instability supernova, the pair production effect causes a sudden pressure drop in the star's core, leading to a rapid partial collapse. Gravitational potential energy from the collapse causes runaway fusion of the core which entirely disrupts the star, leaving no remnant.

Models show that this phenomenon only happens in stars with extremely low metallicity and masses between about 140 and 260 times the Sun, making them extremely unlikely in the local universe. Although originally expected to produce SLSN explosions hundreds of times greater than a supernova, current models predict that they actually produce luminosities ranging from about the same as a normal core collapse supernova to perhaps 50 times brighter, although remaining bright for much longer.[20]

Magnetar energy release

Models of the creation and subsequent spin down of a magnetar yield much higher luminosities than regular supernova[21][22] events and match the observed properties[23][24] of at least some SLSNe. In cases where pair-instability supernova may not be a good fit for explaining a SLSN,[25] a magnetar explanation is more plausible.

Other models

There are still models for SLSN explosions produced from binary systems, white dwarf or neutron stars in unusual arrangements or undergoing mergers, and some of these are proposed to account for some observed gamma-ray bursts.

See also


  1. MacFadyen (2001). "Supernovae, Jets, and Collapsars". The Astrophysical Journal 550 (1): 410–425. arXiv:astro-ph/9910034. Bibcode 2001ApJ...550..410M. doi:10.1086/319698.
  2. Katz, Johnathan I. (2002). The Biggest Bangs. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-514570-4
  3. Bloom (1998). "THE HOST GALAXY OF GRB 970508". The Astrophysical Journal 507 (507): L25–28. arXiv:astro-ph/9807315. Bibcode 1998ApJ...507L..25B. doi:10.1086/311682.
  4. Paczynski. GRBs as Hypernovae.
  5. Woosley (1999). "Gamma-Ray Bursts and Type Ic Supernovae: SN 1998bw". The Astrophysical Journal 516 (2): 788–796. arXiv:astro-ph/9806299. Bibcode 1999ApJ...516..788W. doi:10.1086/307131.
  6. Dado (2003). "The Supernova associated with GRB 030329". Astrophysical Journal 594 (2): L89–92. arXiv:astro-ph/0304106. Bibcode 2003ApJ...594L..89D. doi:10.1086/378624.
  7. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1 at line 876: attempt to call method 'sub' (a nil value).
  8. Smartt, S. J. et al. (17 June 2018). "ATLAS18qqn (AT2018cow) - a bright transient spatially coincident with CGCG 137-068 (60 Mpc)". The Astronomer's Telegram (11727). Retrieved 25 September 2018.
  9. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1 at line 379: attempt to call method 'match' (a nil value).
  10. Heger (2003). "How Massive Stars End Their Life". Astrophysical Journal 591 (1): 288–300. arXiv:astro-ph/0212469. Bibcode 2003ApJ...591..288H. doi:10.1086/375341.
  11. Quimby, R. M.; Kulkarni, S. R.; Kasliwal, M. M.; Gal-Yam, A.; Arcavi, I.; Sullivan, M.; Nugent, P.; Thomas, R. et al. (2011). "Hydrogen-poor superluminous stellar explosions". Nature 474 (7352): 487–9. arXiv:0910.0059. Bibcode 2011Natur.474..487Q. doi:10.1038/nature10095. PMID 21654747.
  12. Gal-Yam, Avishay (2012). "Luminous Supernovae". Science 337 (6097): 927–32. arXiv:1208.3217. Bibcode 2012Sci...337..927G. doi:10.1126/science.1203601. PMID 22923572.
  13. 13.0 13.1 McCrum, M.; Smartt, S. J.; Kotak, R.; Rest, A.; Jerkstrand, A.; Inserra, C.; Rodney, S. A.; Chen, T.- W. et al. (2013). "The superluminous supernova PS1-11ap: Bridging the gap between low and high redshift". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (1): 656–674. arXiv:1310.4417. Bibcode 2014MNRAS.437..656M. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1923.
  14. Chornock, R.; Berger, E.; Rest, A.; Milisavljevic, D.; Lunnan, R.; Foley, R. J.; Soderberg, A. M.; Smartt, S. J. et al. (2013). "PS1-10afx at z = 1.388: Pan-STARRS1 Discovery of a New Type of Superluminous Supernova". The Astrophysical Journal 767 (2): 162. arXiv:1302.0009. Bibcode 2013ApJ...767..162C. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/162.
  15. Fujimoto, S. I.; Nishimura, N.; Hashimoto, M. A. (2008). "Nucleosynthesis in Magnetically Driven Jets from Collapsars". The Astrophysical Journal 680 (2): 1350–1358. arXiv:0804.0969. Bibcode 2008ApJ...680.1350F. doi:10.1086/529416.
  16. Smith, N.; Chornock, R.; Li, W.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Silverman, J. M.; Foley, R. J.; Filippenko, A. V.; Barth, A. J. (2008). "SN 2006tf: Precursor Eruptions and the Optically Thick Regime of Extremely Luminous Type IIn Supernovae". The Astrophysical Journal 686 (1): 467–484. arXiv:0804.0042. Bibcode 2008ApJ...686..467S. doi:10.1086/591021.
  17. Gal-Yam, A.; Leonard, D. C. (2009). "A Massive Hypergiant Star as the Progenitor of the Supernova SN 2005gl". Nature 458 (7240): 865–867. Bibcode 2009Natur.458..865G. doi:10.1038/nature07934. PMID 19305392.
  18. Smith, N.; Chornock, R.; Silverman, J. M.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J. (2010). "Spectral Evolution of the Extraordinary Type IIn Supernova 2006gy". The Astrophysical Journal 709 (2): 856–883. arXiv:0906.2200. Bibcode 2010ApJ...709..856S. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/856.
  19. Fraley, G. S. (1968). "Supernovae Explosions Induced by Pair-Production Instability". Astrophysics and Space Science 2 (1): 96–114. Bibcode 1968Ap&SS...2...96F. doi:10.1007/BF00651498.
  20. Kasen, D.; Woosley, S. E.; Heger, A. (2011). "Pair Instability Supernovae: Light Curves, Spectra, and Shock Breakout". The Astrophysical Journal 734 (2): 102. arXiv:1101.3336. Bibcode 2011ApJ...734..102K. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/102.
  21. Woosley, S.E. (August 2010). "Bright Supernovae From Magnetar Birth". Astrophysical Journal Letters 719 (2): L204–L207. arXiv:0911.0698. Bibcode 2010ApJ...719L.204W. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L204.
  22. Kasen, Daniel; Bildsten, Lars (2010). "Supernova Light Curves Powered by Young Magnetars". Astrophysical Journal 717 (1): 245–249. arXiv:0911.0680. Bibcode 2010ApJ...717..245K. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/245.
  23. Inserra, C.; Smartt, S. J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Valenti, S.; Fraser, M.; Wright, D.; Smith, K.; Chen, T.-W. et al. (June 2013). "Super Luminous Ic Supernovae: catching a magnetar by the tail". The Astrophysical Journal 770 (2): 128. arXiv:1304.3320. Bibcode 2013ApJ...770..128I. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/128.
  24. Howell, D. A.; Kasen, D.; Lidman, C.; Sullivan, M.; Conley, A.; Astier, P.; Balland, C.; Carlberg, R. G. et al. (October 2013). "Two superluminous supernovae from the early universe discovered by the Supernova Legacy Survey". Astrophysical Journal 779 (2): 98. arXiv:1310.0470. Bibcode 2013ApJ...779...98H. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/98.
  25. Nicholl, M.; Smartt, S. J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Inserra, C.; McCrum, M.; Kotak, R.; Fraser, M.; Wright, D. et al. (October 2013). "Slowly fading super-luminous supernovae that are not pair-instability explosions". Nature 502 (7471): 346–9. arXiv:1310.4446. Bibcode 2013Natur.502..346N. doi:10.1038/nature12569. PMID 24132291.

Further reading

External links

Observation data
Epoch {{{epoch}}}      Equinox
Constellation {{{3}}}
Right ascension {{{ra1}}}
Declination {{{dec1}}}
Apparent magnitude (V) {{{appmag_v1}}}
Right ascension {{{ra2}}}
Declination {{{dec2}}}
Apparent magnitude (V) {{{appmag_v2}}}
Evolutionary stage {{{9}}}
Spectral type {{{7}}}
Distance{{{4}}} ly
Radius{{{5}}} R
Diameter{{{5}}} D
Luminosity (bolometric){{{11}}} L
Temperature{{{8}}} K
Other designations
{{{1}}}, {{{2}}}

{{{1}}}, also known as {{{2}}}, is a star located in the constellation {{{3}}}. It is located {{{4}}} light years away from the Earth. {{{1}}} has a diameter of {{{5}}} D, making it around the size of the orbit of {{{6}}}. {{{1}}} has a stellar class of {{{7}}} and a temperature of {{{8}}} degrees Kelvin; it is a {{{9}}} that is currently burning {{{10}}} within its core. {{{1}}} is around {{{11}}} times brighter than the Sun. {{{12}}}{{{13}}}