NGC 1277

From the Science Archives, the open-project database of science information
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NGC 1277
NGC 1277 viewed by Hubble.jpg
NGC 1277 as seen by the HST
Observation data (J2000 epoch)
Right ascension03h 19m 51.5s[1]
Declination41° 34′ 25″[1]
Helio radial velocity5066 km/s[1]
Galactocentric velocity5168 km/s[1]
Distance73 Mpc (240 Mly)[2]
Group or clusterPerseus Cluster[3][2]
Apparent magnitude (V)14.66[1]
TypeS0^+, pec[1]
Size~52,700 ly (16.16 kpc) (estimated)[1]
Apparent size (V)1.0 x 0.4[1]
Other designations
PGC 12434, LGG 088
References: [1]
See also: Galaxy, List of galaxies

NGC 1277 is a lenticular galaxy in the constellation of Perseus. It is a member of the Perseus Cluster of galaxies and is located approximately 73Mpc (Mega parsecs)[2] or 220 million light years from the Milky Way. It has an apparent magnitude of about 14.7. It was discovered on December 4, 1875 by Lawrence Parsons, 4th Earl of Rosse.

NGC 1277 has been called a "relic of the early universe" due to its stars being formed during a 100 million year interval about 12 billion years ago. Stars were formed at a rate of 1000 times that of the Milky Way galaxy's formation rate in a short burst of time. After this process of stellar formation ran its course, NGC 1277 was left populated with metal-rich stars that are about 7 billion years older than our Sun.[2] It is still uncertain whether or not NGC 1277 is a "relic galaxy"; current studies are still researching the possibility.[4][5]However, observations with Hubble Space Telescope indicate that NGC 1277 lacks metal-poor globular clusters, suggesting that it has accreted little mass over its lifetime and supporting the relic galaxy hypothesis.[6]

Supermassive black hole[edit]

Hubble Space Telescope image of galaxies in the Perseus Cluster. NGC 1277 is the bright galaxy just to the left of the center of the image.

Initial observations made using the Hobby-Eberly Telescope at Texas's McDonald Observatory suggested the presence of a black hole with a mass of about 1.7×1010 M (17 billion solar masses), equivalent to 14% of the total stellar mass of the galaxy, due to the motions of the stars near the center of the galaxy.[7] This resulted in the initial claim that the black hole in NGC 1277 is one of the largest known in relation to the mass of its host galaxy.

A follow-up study,[8] based on the same data and published the following year, reached a very different conclusion. The black hole that was initially suggested at 1.7×1010 M was not as massive as once thought. The black hole was estimated to be between 2 and 5 billion solar masses. This is less than a third of the previously estimated mass, a significant decrease. Models with no black hole at all were also found to provide reasonably good fits to the data, including the central region.

Subsequent investigations employed adaptive optics to acquire a better estimate of the mass of the black hole.[4][5] One group made observations using the Gemini Near Infrared Integral Field Spectrometer to better determine the mass of the black hole at the center of NGC 1277.[4] The group used similar models to that of van den Bosch, but with higher spatial resolution. After using stellar dynamics and luminosity models to estimate the mass of the black hole, they came to a mass of 4.9×109 M, similar to the estimate from the follow-up study done by Emsellem,[8] which estimated a mass between 2–5 billion solar masses. More recently, a new group[5] made observations using the larger Keck Telescope with superior spatial resolution, and calculated that a black hole with mass 1.2×109 M fits best. Moreover, this value is an order of magnitude smaller than first reported by van den Bosch,[7] and was noted to probably be an upper limit due to the edge-on rotating disk in NGC 1277.


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1 at line 379: attempt to call method 'match' (a nil value).
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Trujillo, Ignacio; Ferré-Mateu, Anna; Balcells, Marc; Vazdekis, Alexandre; Sánchez-Blázquez, Patricia (1 January 2014). "NGC 1277: A Massive Compact Relic Galaxy in the Nearby Universe". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 780: L20. arXiv:1310.6367. Bibcode 2014ApJ...780L..20T. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/780/2/L20. ISSN 0004-637X.
  3. Brunzendorf, J.; Meusinger, H. (October 1, 1999). "The galaxy cluster Abell 426 (Perseus). A catalogue of 660 galaxy positions, isophotal magnitudes and morphological types" (in en). Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 139 (1): 141–161. doi:10.1051/aas:1999111. ISSN 0365-0138.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Walsh, Jonelle L.; van den Bosch, Remco C. E.; Gebhardt, Karl; Yildirim, Akin; Richstone, Douglas O.; Gültekin, Kayhan; Husemann, Bernd (1 January 2016). "A 5 x 109 Msun Black Hole in NGC 1277 from Adaptive Optics Spectroscopy". The Astrophysical Journal 817: 2. arXiv:1511.04455. Bibcode 2016ApJ...817....2W. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/2. ISSN 0004-637X.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Graham, Alister W.; Durré, Mark; Savorgnan, Giulia A. D.; Medling, Anne M.; Batcheldor, Dan; Scott, Nicholas; Watson, Beverly; Marconi, Alessandro (1 March 2016). "A Normal Supermassive Black Hole in NGC 1277". The Astrophysical Journal 819: 43. arXiv:1601.05151. Bibcode 2016ApJ...819...43G. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/43. ISSN 0004-637X.
  6. Beasley, Michael A.; Trujillo, Ignacio; Leaman, Ryan; Montes, Mireia (2018-03-12). "A single population of red globular clusters around the massive compact galaxy NGC 1277" (in En). Nature 555 (7697): 483–486. doi:10.1038/nature25756. ISSN 0028-0836.
  7. 7.0 7.1 van den Bosch, Remco C. E. et al. (29 Nov 2012). "An over-massive black hole in the compact lenticular galaxy NGC 1277". Nature 491 (7426): 729–731. arXiv:1211.6429. Bibcode 2012Natur.491..729V. doi:10.1038/nature11592. PMID 23192149. Retrieved 29 Nov 2012.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Emsellem, Eric (Aug 2013). "Is the black hole in NGC 1277 really overmassive?". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 433 (3): 1862–1870. arXiv:1305.3630. Bibcode 2013MNRAS.433.1862E. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt840.

Add your comment
The Science Archives welcomes all comments. If you do not want to be anonymous, register or log in. It is free.

As a reminder, article comments are only for discussions on how to improve the article. Please direct other comments to a user's talk page. Please be formal and do not use excessive uppercase. Please be advised you may receive an automatic block if you break the article comments policy. For information regarding what is acceptable/not acceptable in article comments, please message Joey (talk), ynoss (talk), or Nussun (talk).